PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL – July 1, 2025
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Asked to Rein in Judicial Overreach in Right-to-Know Case
Ephrata, PA (July 1, 2025) — Mike Miller, a Lancaster County resident, has petitioned the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to review a series of judicial rulings that, he argues, threaten to dismantle the Right-to-Know Law (RTKL) by replacing it with improvised court procedures that deny due process and shield public agencies from accountability. The petition [...]
📚 Track 1: Eastern District Civil Rights Case (42 U.S.C. § 1983)
📚 Track 1: Eastern District Civil Rights Case (42 U.S.C. § 1983) Filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania – Federal claims under the First & Fourteenth Amendments against County of Lancaster and five officials in their individual capacities. ⚖️ District Court Docket https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69231642/miller-v-county-of-lancaster/ 📝 Appeal – Third Circuit (Case No. 25-1423) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69828889/michael-miller-v-county-of-lancaster/ [...]
How to Read the Court Docket
The full federal case is now public. You can read the filings, track the timeline, and see for yourself how justice is — or isn’t — being served. 🔗 DIRECT LINK TO CASE: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69231642/miller-v-county-of-lancaster/ 🧭 Or get full analysis and updates at: 🌐 www.showmetheballots.net ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 🔍 *What Is a Docket?* It’s the official timeline of [...]
The Federal Court Fraud Against Pro Se Litigants
Most pro se litigants trust that if they follow the rules, the court will fairly apply the law. But here’s what really happens when a pro se litigant challenges a government entity in federal court: Step 1: The Judge Rewrites Your Case Judges and government lawyers pretend your case is about something it’s not—mischaracterizing your [...]
How Federal Judges Block Constitutional Claims—And Why It Should Worry You
Imagine you take a case to federal court, because your constitutional rights have been violated. You follow the rules, file your complaint, and expect the judge to fairly apply the law. Instead, the court twists procedural rules to avoid even addressing your claims, dismissing your case without ever considering the merits. Worse, when you appeal, [...]
How a Magistrate Judge Got Caught Rigging a Case—And Why It Matters to You
When people think about courtroom justice, they imagine a fair fight—both sides present their case, and a neutral judge applies the law. But what happens when a judge is not neutral, and the system is set up to protect them instead of holding them accountable? That’s exactly what I’m exposing in two filings that challenge [...]
A Ruling That Defies Logic, Law, and Basic Fairness – Lancaster, PA – March 31, 2025
In my civil rights case against Lancaster County, the federal judge handling the matter just handed down a ruling that defies logic, law, and basic fairness. On March 7, he dismissed most of my claims—even though he admitted he didn’t have jurisdiction over some of them. See ECF 35 and 36. He said he couldn’t [...]
Federal Judge Refuses to Rule for 90 Days—Pro Se Plaintiff Fights Back – Lancaster, PA. February 21, 2025
On February 21, 2025, I filed a motion demanding that Judge Joseph Leeson issue findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 52(a), when ruling on Defendants’ motions to dismiss in my First Amendment case. For 90 days, Leeson has refused to rule on these motions, effectively stalling my case and preventing me from [...]
Seeking Sanctions for Bad-Faith Litigation by County of Lancaster. Lancaster, PA. January 20, 2025
I’ve witnessed firsthand how procedural abuse can turn legitimate constitutional claims into an exhausting uphill battle. My lawsuit was filed to challenge government misconduct and protect constitutional rights, but instead of receiving a fair day in court, I’ve faced a relentless campaign of procedural tactics designed to suppress my claims, punish my advocacy, and [...]